Journal of Near-Death Studies
Vol. 41, No. 1, Spring 2023
- Editor's Foreword • Janice Miner Holden, EdD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-1-p1-2 - Critique of Recent Report of Electrical Activity in the Dying Human Brain • Pim van Lommel, MD; and Bruce Greyson, MD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-1-p3-8 - Comments on the Results of the AWARE II Study • Alejandro Agudo, Lic.; Eduardo Jorge Fulco, and Titus Rivas, MA, MSc
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-1-p9-22 - Animals and Near-Death Experiences • Bruce Greyson, MD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-1-p23-39 - Near-Death Experiences, Post-Traumatic Stress, and Supernormal Abilities in a Latin American Sample • Alex A. Álvarez, PhD; Rodrigo Arriola-Godoy, MSc; and Ramsés D’León, BSc
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-1-p40-66 - Terminal Lucidity: The Need for Accuracy and Integrity • Alexander Batthyány, PhD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-1-p67-71 - The Matter and Meaning of Near-Death Studies in the Humanities • Marco Condorelli, PhD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-1-p72-75 - Obituary: Diane Corcoran, PhD, US Army Colonel (Retired) • Janice Miner Holden, EdD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-1-p76-77
Vol. 41, No. 2, Summer 2023
SPECIAL ISSUE: SHOULD IANDS ENDORSE A POST-PHYSICALIST WORLDVIEW?
- Editor's Foreword • Janice Miner Holden, EdD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-1-p1-2 - Editorial: Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview? • Janice Miner Holden, EdD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p81-90 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?" • John R. Audette, MS
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p91-94 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?" • Thomas Brophy, PhD, on behalf of the Institute of Noetic Sciences
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p95-96 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?": Why IANDS Should Not Endorse a Specific Worlview • Nancy Evans Bush, MA
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p97-102 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?": Why IANDS Should Not Endorse a Specific Worlview • Bruce Greyson, MD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p103-108 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?" • Neal Grossman, PhD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p109-111 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?": Maybe Keep the Original Statement But Add Something to It? • Edward F. Kelly, PhD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p112-114 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?" • Jeffrey Long, MD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p115-120 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?" • David Lorimer, MA, PGCE, FRSA
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p121-122 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?": Balancing Perspectives: The Significant of Empirical Evidence in Scientific Inquiry • Charlotte Martial, PhD; Pauline Fritz, MSc; & Olivia Gosseries, PhD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p123-128 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?" • Robert G. Mays, BSc; & Suzanne B. Mays, AAS
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p129-131 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?" • Kenneth Ring, PhD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p132-133 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?": NDE Research Needs Firm Guiderails but Soft Boundaries • David Rousseau, PhD, BEng, FRSA
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p134-144 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?" • Michael Sabom, MD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p145-149 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?" • Pim van Lommel, MD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p150-153 - Response to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?" • Marjorie Woollacott, PhD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p154 - Rejoinder to Responses to Editorial "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?" • Janice Miner Holden, EdD; Marjorie Woollacott, PhD; Robert G. Mays, BSc; and Norman Klaunig, MA, MBA, NCC, LPCAssociate (TX), PhD student
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p155-162 - Book Review: The Substance of Consciousness: A Comprehensive Defense of Contemporary Substance Dualism by Brandon Rickebaugh & J. P. Moreland • Reviewed by Gary Habermas, PhD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-2-p163-166
Vol. 41, No. 3, Fall 2023
- Editor's Foreword • Janice Miner Holden, EdD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-3-p167-168 - Researchers' and Experiencers' Descriptions of Near-Death Experiences: In Search of a Conceptual Model • Bruce Greyson, MD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-3-p169-201 - Analysis of Recent Objections to the Traditional Near-Death Experience Argument for a Transphysical Self • Patrick Brissey, PhD
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-3-p202-238 - Book Review: Coma and Near-Death Experience: The Beautiful, Disturbing, and Dangerous World of the Unconscious by Allen and Beverley Pearce • Reviewed by Dan Punzak, BS, PE
https://doi.org/10.17514/JNDS-2023-41-3-p239-245